「实战!用 Spring Gateway 配合 Sa-Token 实现微服务无感鉴权」的评论 https://blog.hikarilan.life/tech/1239/%e5%ae%9e%e6%88%98%ef%bc%81%e7%94%a8-spring-gatway-%e9%85%8d%e5%90%88-sa-token-%e5%ae%9e%e7%8e%b0%e5%be%ae%e6%9c%8d%e5%8a%a1%e6%97%a0%e6%84%9f%e9%89%b4%e6%9d%83/ 兰草凋荡,星辰璀璨 Wed, 15 May 2024 05:21:39 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8 评论者:贺兰星辰 https://blog.hikarilan.life/tech/1239/%e5%ae%9e%e6%88%98%ef%bc%81%e7%94%a8-spring-gatway-%e9%85%8d%e5%90%88-sa-token-%e5%ae%9e%e7%8e%b0%e5%be%ae%e6%9c%8d%e5%8a%a1%e6%97%a0%e6%84%9f%e9%89%b4%e6%9d%83/#comment-378 Wed, 15 May 2024 05:21:39 +0000 https://my.minecraft.kim/?p=1239#comment-378 回复给 阿杰

肯定是不行的啊… 网关和下游是分离的

]]>
评论者:阿杰 https://blog.hikarilan.life/tech/1239/%e5%ae%9e%e6%88%98%ef%bc%81%e7%94%a8-spring-gatway-%e9%85%8d%e5%90%88-sa-token-%e5%ae%9e%e7%8e%b0%e5%be%ae%e6%9c%8d%e5%8a%a1%e6%97%a0%e6%84%9f%e9%89%b4%e6%9d%83/#comment-377 Wed, 15 May 2024 05:14:51 +0000 https://my.minecraft.kim/?p=1239#comment-377 权限注解失效了,不能结合sa自带的注解进行鉴权吗

]]>
评论者:Shanwer https://blog.hikarilan.life/tech/1239/%e5%ae%9e%e6%88%98%ef%bc%81%e7%94%a8-spring-gatway-%e9%85%8d%e5%90%88-sa-token-%e5%ae%9e%e7%8e%b0%e5%be%ae%e6%9c%8d%e5%8a%a1%e6%97%a0%e6%84%9f%e9%89%b4%e6%9d%83/#comment-345 Thu, 08 Feb 2024 11:57:35 +0000 https://my.minecraft.kim/?p=1239#comment-345 Sa-Token 1.37版看了下可以正常阅读了,应该是之前被炎上到修改了吧(

]]>
评论者:实战!为你的网站接入 Passkey 通行密钥以实现无密码安全登录 - HikariLan's Blog https://blog.hikarilan.life/tech/1239/%e5%ae%9e%e6%88%98%ef%bc%81%e7%94%a8-spring-gatway-%e9%85%8d%e5%90%88-sa-token-%e5%ae%9e%e7%8e%b0%e5%be%ae%e6%9c%8d%e5%8a%a1%e6%97%a0%e6%84%9f%e9%89%b4%e6%9d%83/#comment-302 Wed, 23 Aug 2023 14:24:40 +0000 https://my.minecraft.kim/?p=1239#comment-302 […] 代表用户 ID,由上游 Gateway 注入到 header 上,如果不了解的话可以看这篇文章;credential 为前端向我们提交的凭证信息;至于为什么要用到 […]

]]>
评论者:xyns https://blog.hikarilan.life/tech/1239/%e5%ae%9e%e6%88%98%ef%bc%81%e7%94%a8-spring-gatway-%e9%85%8d%e5%90%88-sa-token-%e5%ae%9e%e7%8e%b0%e5%be%ae%e6%9c%8d%e5%8a%a1%e6%97%a0%e6%84%9f%e9%89%b4%e6%9d%83/#comment-295 Tue, 08 Aug 2023 09:14:09 +0000 https://my.minecraft.kim/?p=1239#comment-295 666

]]>